The article examines claims that OpenAI's recent work allegedly solved a variant of the Navier‑Stokes equations, arguing that the problem addressed may not be the mathematically correct formulation. It questions whether the AI‑generated solution pertains to the proper physical constraints and boundary conditions required for the classic Navier‑Stokes existence and smoothness problem. The discussion highlights the importance of distinguishing between numerically approximated solutions and rigorous mathematical proofs.